Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:41

Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Should you track your blood sugar with a continuous glucose monitor? - NPR
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Get Deals On Super Mario And Zelda Games With Free Switch 2 Upgrades - GameSpot
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why did the UK Supreme Court rule that transgender women are not women?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why did lobsters evolve bright colors if they are neither poisonous nor venomous?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
150-Million-Year-Old Stegosaurus Skull Rewrites Dinosaur Evolution - SciTechDaily
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Apple is on defense at WWDC 2025 - The Verge
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.